A disciplined acquisition checklist for nonresident families buying through a U.S. entity, from tax classification and comparable sales to terrace evidence, bespoke finishes, building reserves, and a carefully bounded appraisal-gap commitment.
A South Florida residence can be both a deeply personal acquisition and a material balance-sheet decision. For a nonresident family purchasing through a U.S. entity, the essential discipline is to distinguish four things: what the family wants, what the market supports, what the lender accepts, and what the contract requires.
Those figures and obligations need not align. A terrace may justify a personal premium without supporting an equivalent appraisal adjustment. A commissioned interior may be exceptional without returning its cost at resale. The family office should make these distinctions explicit before authorizing an offer, rather than reconcile them after a valuation arrives.
A U.S. entity does not automatically eliminate exposure to the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act, or FIRPTA. Review the entity's federal tax classification and the relevant seller's foreign-person status with tax counsel. Place of formation alone does not resolve the question.
The foreign-person definition includes nonresident alien individuals and foreign corporations that have not elected domestic-corporation treatment under the applicable provision. Counsel should distinguish the acquisition from a later disposition and identify whose status matters at each stage.
When a foreign person sells a U.S. real-property interest, the purchaser generally must assess FIRPTA withholding. The general rate is 15% of the amount realized, but exceptions and withholding certificates can alter the obligation. Treat this as a planning question, not an automatic 15% tax on profit.
Separately, ask the proposed lender to confirm its requirements for the actual borrowing entity. Do not assume that suitability for ownership establishes financing eligibility, guaranty terms, or acceptable funds documentation.
The valuation assignment should establish the property interest, effective date, intended use, and material assumptions or conditions. Identify ownership rights explicitly. Do not assume that a family-office review and a financing decision have interchangeable requirements.
For a purchase under consideration at The Residences at 1428 Brickell, begin with the particular residence and its documented rights, not a generalized Brickell price narrative.
Ask whether the analysis addresses highest and best use through four tests: legally permissible, physically possible, financially feasible, and maximally productive. Then examine whether comparable sales reflect location, quality, size, condition, amenities, and transaction timing.
Adjustments should explain differences in property rights, financing terms, sale conditions, market conditions, location, and physical characteristics. Material differences in highest and best use and special assessments also warrant attention. The final conclusion should reconcile applicable valuation approaches, not mechanically average them. These are general valuation principles, not a special Florida condominium pricing formula.
Keep interior and exterior areas distinct in the acquisition file. Ask the appraiser to explain how outdoor space contributes to the valuation and which comparable evidence supports that treatment. Do not apply an assumed terrace-to-interior percentage or a diminishing-value formula without support.
For a Miami Beach search that includes The Perigon Miami Beach, frame terrace questions around the specific residence under evaluation. Request documentation of dimensions, access, permitted use, and the ownership or use rights involved. Ask how configuration, exposure, privacy, and practical usability enter the analysis, rather than assigning each an automatic premium.
The family can separately record its willingness to pay for outdoor living. That personal preference belongs in the investment decision, but should not be presented as market evidence. A premium can be deliberate without being appraiser-supported.
Bespoke improvements require an equally clear distinction between cost and contributory value. The appraisal should describe improvements and amenities in enough detail to establish size, construction quality, condition, and age. An invoice establishes expenditure; it does not, by itself, establish an equal increase in market value.
When reviewing a residence at The Delmore Surfside, apply that principle to the finishes or alterations actually included in the proposed transaction. Do not infer value from the project name or a seller's description of customization.
Request an itemized improvement schedule, supporting documentation where available, and a clear statement of what conveys. Ask the appraiser which elements contribute value and why. Keep the family's design preferences separate from that conclusion, especially where the next owner might choose a different aesthetic.
For a Florida condominium building with three or more habitable stories, request applicable milestone-inspection materials and the Structural Integrity Reserve Study, or SIRS. Have counsel confirm which requirements apply to the particular building rather than treating a general checklist as a complete statement of law.
A milestone inspection concerns structural condition. A SIRS concerns reserve planning for specified structural components. They are distinct documents; neither substitutes for a broader review of budgets, reserves, special-assessment notices, board minutes, insurance information, and repair records.
Whether considering Park Grove Coconut Grove or another condominium, connect building diligence to the valuation review. Special assessments, reserve shortfalls, rising insurance costs, deferred maintenance, and unresolved structural work can affect value and financing eligibility. Ask how relevant obligations and conditions were addressed in the comparable-sales analysis. Do not assume they have been captured simply because the residence itself is well presented.
Discuss an appraisal-gap commitment with transaction counsel as a proposed allocation of risk, not as standard protection. The family office's objective is to know exactly what additional exposure it is authorizing.
Ask counsel to address the benchmark appraisal, a dollar cap on any additional contribution, delivery deadlines, and the treatment of a revised valuation. Clarify what happens if the result exceeds the agreed tolerance: whether the parties may renegotiate, whether termination is available, and how the deposit is treated. None of these rights should be assumed without the executed language.
Separately, ask the lender to explain the financing consequences of a lower valuation. A contractual gap commitment does not confirm that financing will remain available on unchanged terms.
Before granting final authority, assemble a short decision memorandum covering entity review, valuation assumptions, terrace treatment, improvement contributions, building obligations, and any negotiated gap exposure. Record the market-supported conclusion separately from the family's discretionary premium and cash commitment.
That separation allows a beautiful residence to remain a considered acquisition, even when its personal value exceeds its appraised value.
For a discreet South Florida property conversation, connect with MILLION.
If branded residences are on your mind — as a home or as an allocation — we would be glad to share what we are seeing, privately.
Begin a quiet conversationNo. The entity's federal tax classification and the relevant seller's foreign-person status require review; U.S. formation alone does not settle the question.
The general withholding rate is 15% of the amount realized, but exceptions and withholding certificates can change the obligation. It should not be understood as an automatic tax on profit.
It should identify the property interest, effective date, intended use, and material assumptions or conditions. Ownership rights should not be left implicit.
Location, quality, size, condition, amenities, and transaction timing all matter. The analysis should explain material differences, including relevant sale terms and special assessments.
No. The conclusion should reconcile the applicable approaches rather than mechanically average their results.
A universal ratio should not be assumed. Terrace treatment should be supported by relevant comparable evidence and the specific property rights and characteristics being evaluated.
Not automatically. The appraisal question is their contributory value, which can differ from the amount spent.
A milestone inspection assesses structural condition, while a Structural Integrity Reserve Study addresses reserve planning for specified structural components. They serve distinct diligence purposes.
Request applicable inspection materials and the SIRS, along with budgets, reserves, assessment notices, board minutes, insurance information, and repair records. Counsel should confirm the requirements applicable to the building.
Discuss the appraisal benchmark, contribution cap, deadlines, revised valuations, and consequences of a shortfall. Termination and deposit rights depend on the executed contract and should never be assumed.
