A primary-residence review of Una’s water-quality diligence, unconfirmed filtration specifications and component-specific warranty questions, with a practical framework for separating maintenance, insurance and developer obligations.

For a primary-residence buyer, luxury is measured partly in routines that require no second thought: filling a glass, preparing dinner and knowing whom to call when a fixture needs attention. At Una Residences Brickell, those considerations warrant a review separate from the waterfront setting and amenities.
The 47-story condominium stands at 175 SE 25th Road in South Brickell. Its Temporary Certificate of Occupancy was announced in February 2026, and unit closings had begun by March. Those milestones establish delivery context-not the water quality at a particular kitchen faucet, the presence of drinking-water filtration or the coverage for every plumbing component.
A sound review separates three questions: what has been tested, who maintains any treatment equipment and which warranty applies when something fails. No answer should be inferred from the other two.
Annual water-quality disclosures establish a baseline for the municipal supply. The 2025 disclosure was released on April 8, 2026. The preceding year’s disclosure listed 22 detected parameters, but that figure is not a test result for Una or any individual residence. It should not be treated as evidence of a problem inside the building.
Una-specific laboratory results, sampling dates, sampling locations and a documented tap-water testing protocol are not established here. That leaves a question to verify, not a finding that the water is unsafe. Buyers should distinguish municipal information from evidence collected within the building and, ideally, within the residence under consideration.
Request any available building and unit testing records, including dates, locations, measured parameters and sampling procedures. Ask whether samples were taken before or after any treatment equipment. If further testing is appropriate, have a qualified laboratory or water-quality professional define the sampling plan and interpret the results rather than selecting tests without a clear purpose.
For buyers also considering 2200 Brickell, the useful comparison is the documentation available for each residence-not an assumed equivalence between nearby addresses. Keep each property’s evidence separate.
Whole-unit or building-wide drinking-water filtration is not established as a standard Una feature. That is an unconfirmed specification, not proof that filtration is absent. Nor do pools, a children’s splash pad and spa facilities answer a drinking-water treatment question.
Ask for a written description of any installed treatment system, its location and the outlets it serves. Request the make, model, technical cut sheets, stated treatment capabilities and cartridge or service schedule. If no system is included, obtain written guidance on whether a proposed installation requires approval and what documentation the association would request.
Do not treat “filtered” as a complete specification. An informed decision requires an identified system and a stated purpose that can be assessed against the buyer’s concerns. No particular treatment capability, installation requirement or operating cost should be assumed for Una without those details.
For a year-round household, also ask how service access would work and who would arrange replacement parts. These are diligence questions, not representations that particular equipment or service arrangements already exist.
A filter raises distinct questions: who owns it, who services it, who pays for replacement and whose insurance might respond to a covered loss. Those answers should not be collapsed into a single promise that the building “handles the water.”
Florida condominium insurance rules exclude specified in-unit items serving only that unit-including water filters, water heaters, appliances and electrical fixtures-from association property-insurance coverage. That allocation does not, by itself, settle routine maintenance or replacement responsibility.
Review the condominium declaration’s maintenance provisions separately, alongside the bylaws and any applicable equipment or service documents. Ask the association to identify the provisions it relies on to assign responsibility. Have counsel resolve ambiguity before relying on an informal answer to define an ownership obligation.
A useful buyer worksheet gives routine service, consumables, equipment replacement and damage arising from a failure separate entries. Leave each unresolved until the relevant documents support an answer. This makes potential household expenses visible without inventing an Una-specific service charge or assigning duties the declaration has not confirmed.
Under Florida law, the developer’s implied warranty of fitness and merchantability for each unit lasts three years from completion of the building containing that unit. The key timing reference is building completion, not simply the buyer’s closing date. Ask counsel to confirm the applicable completion date and warranty category rather than using the occupancy announcement as a substitute.
The statutory framework distinguishes building-serving systems from mechanical elements serving only one unit. “Three years” should therefore not become a blanket answer for every faucet, valve, filter or other plumbing component. Identify the item, what it serves and the applicable statutory category before deciding that the general unit warranty governs it.
Keep manufacturer warranties separate. Request the installed fixture schedule, applicable written warranties, any registration requirements and the claim procedure. Ask who receives the initial defect notice and what supporting documentation is required.
The same discipline applies when evaluating St. Regis® Residences Brickell: compare written obligations for identified components, not a generalized expectation attached to a luxury address. Do not presume equivalent coverage between projects.
Una-specific fixture exclusions and modification-related warranty restrictions are not established here. Before installing filtration or changing a fixture, request written clarification of any applicable restrictions. Assume neither that alterations automatically void coverage nor that every alteration leaves it untouched.
Before closing, assemble a compact ownership file containing the plumbing specifications, any filtration cut sheets, available testing documentation, declaration and bylaws, and written warranty materials. Add a contact sheet identifying the appropriate route for maintenance requests, warranty claims and insurance questions. These are recommended document requests, not assurances that every item has already been supplied.
The buying decision should rest on documented answers, not an expectation that every operational question has the same answer across luxury condominiums. A treatment system may require owner attention; a component may fall under a different warranty category; a testing question may need further investigation. What matters is understanding those boundaries before they become part of daily life.
Una’s waterfront setting can remain the emotional reason to buy. A clear account of testing, service responsibility and fixture coverage provides the practical confidence to make it home.
Explore more South Florida primary-residence buying considerations with MILLION.
If branded residences are on your mind — as a home or as an allocation — we would be glad to share what we are seeing, privately.
Begin a quiet conversationUna Residences is a 47-story waterfront condominium at 175 SE 25th Road in Miami’s South Brickell neighborhood.
Unit closings had begun by March 2026. Receipt of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy was announced in February.
No. Municipal disclosures provide a supply baseline, not a laboratory result for an individual residence or fixture.
Una-specific laboratory results, sampling dates, locations and a documented testing protocol are not established here. Buyers should request available records without interpreting that uncertainty as evidence of unsafe water.
No, whole-unit or building-wide drinking-water filtration is not confirmed as standard. That does not establish that filtration is absent.
Request the system’s make, model, location, outlets served, technical specifications and service schedule. Ask separately about installation approvals and responsibility for service costs.
No. Insurance allocation and routine maintenance responsibility are separate questions, so buyers should review the declaration’s maintenance provisions.
Under Florida law, the three-year implied unit warranty is tied to completion of the building containing the unit. Buyers should have counsel confirm the applicable completion date rather than assume their closing date controls.
A single blanket period should not be assumed. The statutory framework distinguishes building-serving systems from mechanical elements serving only one unit, making component classification important.
Una-specific modification restrictions are not established here. Obtain written clarification of applicable warranty terms and installation requirements before making changes.


