A Miami condo developer may use qualifying deposits above 10% before closing, but contractual authorization, construction commencement and statutory spending limits matter. Here is how to distinguish protected escrow funds from money eligible for construction use.
Yes, a Miami condominium developer may use certain buyer deposits before closing. That permission is neither automatic nor unlimited. Florida Statute §718.202 and the purchase contract set the boundaries: which funds may be withdrawn, when withdrawals may begin and what the money may finance.
For a luxury buyer, the distinction extends well beyond the deposit schedule. Money delivered to an escrow agent does not necessarily remain untouched until keys change hands. The essential question is whether the contract authorizes qualifying funds to leave escrow during construction.
The statute addresses condominium sales where construction, furnishing and landscaping have not been substantially completed. It provides a framework for understanding an unfinished property's deposit arrangements-not a reason to assume every condominium transaction operates identically.
Start by dividing the deposit obligation into two categories. The general rule requires buyer payments up to 10% of the purchase price to remain in escrow before closing. Payments above that threshold, received before construction is complete, generally belong in a special escrow account controlled by an escrow agent.
The construction-use exception concerns the amount above 10%. It does not, by itself, authorize the developer to spend the entire deposit. Nor should the first-10% rule be read as an unconditional guarantee covering every arrangement; exceptions or alternative protections require contract-specific legal review.
A buyer considering The Residences at 1428 Brickell should bring the same discipline to the paperwork as to selecting the residence. In Brickell, as elsewhere, separate the payment schedule from the withdrawal authority. Payment due dates alone do not establish whether the money must remain in escrow.
Ask counsel to map each installment against the purchase price, identify the portion exceeding 10% and explain how each category is treated. That exercise turns an abstract escrow clause into a clearer picture of the capital potentially available for construction.
The purchase contract must expressly authorize withdrawal of qualifying excess deposits before closing. A general understanding that deposits support development is no substitute for contractual language permitting their release.
Construction of the improvements must also have begun. Signing the purchase agreement alone does not satisfy that separate requirement or eliminate restrictions on how withdrawn money may be used.
Read the relevant provisions together rather than stopping at a reassuring reference to an escrow account. Identify the authorization, the construction trigger and the release procedure. Then ask how those provisions interact with the deposit schedule and any related escrow instructions.
In practical terms, a buyer needs answers to three distinct questions: which payments are eligible for withdrawal, what event permits withdrawal and how the escrow agent is instructed to act. A clear answer to one does not resolve the others. Keeping them separate helps distinguish permission to withdraw from evidence that all conditions have been met.
Qualifying withdrawals must support the actual construction and development of the condominium property containing the buyer's unit. The authorization is property-specific, not permission to finance unrelated developments or unrestricted corporate purposes.
The statute also prohibits using these withdrawn funds for salespersons' salaries, commissions or advertising expenses. A broad reference to development should not obscure those express spending limits.
For someone evaluating The Perigon Miami Beach, document review is separate from the appeal of a Miami Beach address. The relevant inquiry is what the buyer's agreement permits, not what the residence's positioning or presentation might suggest.
Ask counsel to examine whether the permitted-use language tracks the condominium property and the statutory boundaries. These are general review principles, not descriptions of any named project's escrow provisions. No project's withdrawal rights should be inferred without reading its documents.
Once eligibility is clear, examine the mechanics. Does the agreement require notice before a withdrawal? Must supporting documents accompany a request? Is a developer certification sufficient under the stated procedure? Who receives the request, and what must the escrow agent review?
These are contract-specific questions. Do not assume that a universal advance-notice requirement or a uniform package of supporting documents applies to every authorized construction withdrawal.
A purchaser considering Bentley Residences Sunny Isles can use the same checklist when reviewing a Sunny Isles Beach purchase agreement. Establish what the documents require before money moves, rather than discovering the procedure after a release.
Keep the review focused on practical visibility: what information you will receive, when you will receive it and what record will explain the disbursement. If the answers are unclear, seek clarification before committing additional funds. The aim is clarity, not an assumption that a particular notice or approval right already exists.
If a buyer properly terminates under the contract or Chapter 718, the statute directs payment of escrowed funds to the buyer with any interest earned. If the buyer defaults on contractual obligations, it provides for payment of escrowed funds and earned interest to the developer.
The word escrowed matters. Money remaining in the account is different from money already lawfully disbursed for construction. An escrow-return provision is not assurance that the account still holds the entire deposit. Ask counsel to distinguish the balance remaining in escrow from any separate recovery questions involving released funds.
Interest also deserves attention. If the contract does not specify who receives it, the statutory default awards it to the developer at closing.
At closing, funds not previously disbursed may be released to the developer unless the buyer gives the escrow agent written notice of a dispute before disbursement. That closing-related provision should not be treated as an automatic veto over every otherwise authorized construction withdrawal.
The strongest review produces a clear written understanding: the amount generally protected in escrow, the excess potentially available for construction, the authorization and trigger, and the procedures for release, termination and closing disputes.
Have Florida condominium counsel review the operative agreement and escrow documents before signing or funding further installments. This overview is general information, not transaction-specific legal advice. The objective is not to treat every authorized withdrawal as a warning sign, but to understand precisely when your funds may leave escrow and what limits govern their use.
For a considered approach to South Florida residential opportunities, connect with MILLION.
If branded residences are on your mind — as a home or as an allocation — we would be glad to share what we are seeing, privately.
Begin a quiet conversationYes, qualifying deposits above 10% may be used within statutory limits when the contract expressly authorizes withdrawal and construction has begun.
Yes, that is the general rule. It is not an unconditional guarantee for every arrangement, so counsel should review any exceptions or alternative protections.
No. They generally must be held in a special escrow account, with construction withdrawals subject to contractual authorization and statutory conditions.
Not by itself. Construction of the improvements must have begun, and the contract must expressly authorize qualifying withdrawals.
The construction-use permission is specific to the condominium property containing the buyer's unit. It does not authorize spending on unrelated developments.
No. The statute prohibits using these withdrawn funds for salespersons' salaries, commissions or advertising expenses.
Do not assume a universal advance-notice requirement applies. Review the agreement's notice provisions, supporting-document requirements and release procedure with counsel.
The statute directs return of escrowed funds with earned interest upon proper termination. That does not mean the account still contains funds already lawfully disbursed.
The statutory default awards interest to the developer at closing if the contract does not specify otherwise.
No. The closing-related written-dispute provision should not be treated as an automatic veto over authorized construction withdrawals.
